1 / 9
IDDI × BMWE Germany

Turn the intro call into a standards workplan.

Meeting prep for Stela Ivanova + IDDI Secretariat + Jack Fraser. Core move: propose a WG II interoperability track connecting product GHG standards, ISO/EN EPD rules and procurement guidance.

2 / 9
Meeting snapshot

What this call is really about

Surface agenda

Introductory alignment with Jack Fraser, IDDI’s new GHG standards specialist.

Strategic opportunity

Give Jack a concrete, high-value first assignment: product standards + EPD interoperability for GPP.

Your posture

Warm welcome, fast orientation, then operational: “Can we turn this into a July-ready WG II output?”

Stela alignment

Position Germany as the bridge between EU policy, industrial standards and real procurement language.

3 / 9
Recent context

Bring these facts into the room

April SC missed

Dietram and Stela missed the April Steering Committee; materials reshared via Basecamp. Next SC: July 2026.

WG sessions

GPP Criteria Survey + Guidance EU session on 28 May; APAC session on 2 June.

Germany input

Procurement guidance should be clear for officers; technical harmonization stays in WG II.

Useful bridge: “This is exactly where a standards interoperability note can help.”

4 / 9
Suggested WG II track

Product Carbon + EPD Interoperability

Core question: what minimum information must a product-level carbon claim or EPD contain so governments can use it for low-emission steel, cement and concrete procurement across jurisdictions?

1. Map

GHG Protocol Product Standard, ISO 14067, EN 15804 / EPDs, IDDI PCR guidance.

2. Translate

Boundary, unit, modules, data quality, verification and comparability into GPP language.

3. Pilot

Steel first, cement/concrete second; include EU and India to avoid Eurocentric guidance.

5 / 9
Standards landscape

Same family, different jobs

Instrument
Main job
Procurement value
Risk
WG II role
GHG Protocol Product Standard
Full life-cycle GHG accounting/reporting
Global language for product GHG claims
Not sector-PCR-specific enough
Connect to heavy-industry GPP needs
ISO 14067
Carbon footprint quantification aligned with LCA
Credible quantification basis
Communication/offsetting outside scope
Clarify what “CFP” supports in tenders
EN 15804 / EPDs
Construction product PCR + EPD modules
Mature construction disclosure system
Comparability is conditional
Prevent procurement overinterpretation
IDDI PCR guidance
Sector harmonization for steel/cement/concrete
Turns methods into usable sector rules
Needs uptake and maintenance
Own the translation layer
6 / 9
ASCII model

The comparability layer

                         IDDI WG II: COMPARABILITY LAYER
        ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
        │ Procurement question: can I compare and buy lower-carbon │
        │ steel / cement / concrete without greenwash or trade fog?│
        └───────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
                                    │
        ┌───────────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐
        │ PRODUCT CARBON CLAIM: value + unit + boundary + QA + V&V │
        └───────────────┬──────────────────────┬───────────────────┘
                        │                      │
        ┌───────────────▼──────────────┐       │
        │ GHG Protocol Product Standard │       │
        └───────────────┬──────────────┘       │
        ┌───────────────▼──────────────┐       │
        │ ISO 14067: product CFP        │       │
        └───────────────┬──────────────┘       │
        ┌───────────────▼──────────────┐       │
        │ EN 15804 / EPD modules        │◄──────┘
        └───────────────┬──────────────┘
        ┌───────────────▼──────────────┐
        │ IDDI PCR Harmonisation        │
        └───────────────┬──────────────┘
        ┌───────────────▼──────────────┐
        │ GPP criteria / tender language│
        └──────────────────────────────┘
7 / 9
Your 30-second intervention

“With GHG Protocol and ISO moving toward updated harmonized product-level GHG accounting, and EPD frameworks already heavily used in construction, IDDI can provide the procurement and heavy-industry use case. WG II could map GHG Protocol Product Standard, ISO 14067, EN 15804/EPDs and IDDI PCR guidance into a practical interoperability matrix for steel, cement and concrete.”

Aim: not to declare them equivalent, but to say what governments can safely reference in GPP criteria.

8 / 9
Questions to land

Use questions to create ownership

9 / 9
Close with next steps

Ask for a crisp follow-up

By next week

Jack + Dietram outline 2-page issue note and matrix headings.

By WG sessions

Use GPP Criteria Survey discussions to validate procurement questions.

By July SC

Present matrix v0.1 and ask for mandate / contributors.

Watch-outs

Do not say “EPDs are enough.” Say: EPDs are useful only when PCR, boundaries, data rules and verification support comparison.

Sources: mail/calendar query; IDDI WG II KB notes; GHG Protocol Product Standard; ISO 14067; EN 15804 summary; IDDI PCR Harmonisation context.